Assured claim later denied
by Assurance given, claim denied. on Oct 19, 2019
1 out of 5 stars
I bought the house 2 years ago in 2016. I am first time home buyer and don't know much about these insurances. I went on vacation for 3 weeks for when I came back and entered my house, it was all ice because of flood due to the water pipes burst in the house (second floor under washroom). I called insurance and told the complete story and they sent the appraiser the next day but didn't arrange any other accommodation for me. I had to pay all that expense from my pocket. In the end, they put it on me that it was my mistake that I didn't hand over keys to someone to take care of the house or I should have put surveillance cameras to check the house or I should have closed the water tab and drained all the water. I didn't know these things because this was the first time I was going on vacation. So finally I got a call this Friday that they declined my insurance claim, so now I am in debt of almost $15k to $20K.
We had a basement flood after a pipe burst. They were quick to respond, seemed fair in their coverage, and the representative we dealt with was very personable and helped us smooth out any little bumps (like speeding up the contractor now and then!).
I am writing to express my extreme displeasure in working with TD Meloche Monnex. I had taken up a coverage with TD last year after we moved into our new home last year in May. I had taken the policy up as it offered some options that my earlier provider Co-operators was not able to cover. Although the premium was higher by almost $ 300 then I took up the policy.
This year towards the renewal period (May 21st) I was told that the policy premium will go up for $ 65 to $ 88 a month on grounds of Alberta Floods. I hate the time of this discussion and questioned the logic of increasing the premium by over 35 % as it was widely in the news to expect a 10-20 % increase. I was told by the agent over the phone that we will need to accept it as this is the rate..
I had at that very moment decided to shop around for alternative provider as it just did not feel right. The cherry on the icing is that when I eventually managed to get a lower 17 days into the renewed policy I was asked to pay a $ 133 short rate fee !!!!!
This seems more like a case of capitalistic arrogance to me. The whole situation is completely controlled. I have to accept the changed exorbitant premium or pay an extra 133 $ for leaving you. The clock starts ticking from the first day of the policy. Best part of the story is that I have to suck up and live with this as I am pressed for time and feel that most others similarly placed people would be.
I am fully aware that TD does offer very different rates to different customers and have clearly witnessed that when Mortgage shopping.I have been banking with TD for 2 years and feel my loyalty with the company has not paid off at all. TD lost out on our mortgage business also due to their lack of responses and I ended up getting offers when they realised I had secured my business somewhere else.
I am a lay person in insurance business but I would understand most companies would underwrite risks with similar parameters which I assume are regulated to some extent. I hate to say that with identical and in some cases better coverage offered by competitor is at a much lower price.
Why should I be paying high premium for a a set up which does not offer even to discuss the policy in detail.Is it my contribution to the high salaries in the corner offices in TD or towards some financial blunders that you might have done and I have to pay for.
On a side note I have clear evidence on the premium hike as I have a quote from Cooperators dated last year April and this year vs TD to indicate the range in differences, which to me should be in similar nos considering all other parameters around it are equal. I would assume both companies had similar write off's due the recent floods. Here again these nos show that the premium hike has no logic and has been done more for an opportune cause than just.
Best part of the story.. 3 email follow ups to customer service to even get an acknowledgement.
I recently reviewed the insurance on 3 properties and they all have increased on average 15% per year over the last 5 years. This increase is not in line with inflation and when questioned I am given the same response that they made a calculating error in their policies causing an disproportionate increase in claims. Furthermore my coverage is decreasing and limits are being set which no longer provide adequate insurance. My sewer backup limit has dropped to $15K from $61K and my premium for this coverage increased $12. Being familiar with the cost of claims I am well aware that $15K will likely only cover the cost of tearing a basement apart and drying it up but leave nothing for restoration or contents. I called to ask why my policy was amended and now under-insured and was told that all policies are now capped at $15K for sewer backup unless I purchase additional insurance. All 3 properties are rated by TDMM as a category 3 risk for sewer backup however the cost to increase coverage from 15K to 50K varies from $35 - $78 per year. They could not answer why the cost for the additional $35K of coverage would vary for properties in the same city, geographical region and risk group.
They also informed me it is my responsibility to know my insurance needs and they can change rates and coverage at any time.
In short I no longer trust TDMM as they are not looking out for me and helping me manage my risk but only care about their risk and their bottom line. If you are not an insurance expert I would stay away from TDMM as their policies are not designed to help you in your time of need.
BTW 10 years insured and never a claim.
Mine increased by 45% due to floods in Calgary and Ice damage in Toronto. I am currently with TD Home/Auto and they said they have increased everyone's from 25% up to 72% from last year. My increased was another $200 per year. BTW, I never had a single claim in all my years of owning a home. As home insurance is not regulated "from the manager", they are able to spread their loss across Canada.
I do not live in or near Calgary or Toronto and I am being penalized so they can recover their loss! Definitely looking at other insurance companies and I am spreading the word around to my friends and family!
I had any excellent experience when my hot water heater broke in 2006 and my basement was flooded. This year it has been a horrible process after having electronics stolen.
The adjuster was unbelievably rude. She didn't ask me any questions at all just went with the report that I gave earlier. She wasn't even aware of what had been stolen or the circumstances.
It was impossibly to get hold of her and she never returned any of my calls. I called her manager and her manager never returned my calls.
Many, many weeks and still no decision about paying my claim!!
I have had to go to the ombudsman!
I decided to go with TD 2 years ago. Find out that my premium has doubled in 2 years. Live in Winnipeg. Sorry what happened in Calgary and Toronto, TD. My $50,000 sewer backup is now $5,000. Over $1200 a year plus taxes for a 1220 sq. ft. house. $1000 deductible to boot. Been claims free for 16 years now. Can do a heck of a lot better than this elsewhere.
I have had a claim resulting from Toronto flood, my total estimate was about 50K, they have only come up with 12K.
If you want to get a better home insurance, please go with State Farm, or RBC. not TD.
Don't waste your money thinking you are covered, because you will not be.
You might like the client service, but when it comes to actual claim, you will definitely be disappointed.
I am planning to take them to court and also going to media.
After being with this insurance company for 15 years with no claims, I received a call to informed my that the sewer backup policy will be changing from $100K to $15 K starting 2014. I however will be paying for the same premium. If an incident will ever happen what can $15K fix these days???
From Lethbridge, AB
Secure and Certified
Your information privacy and security is very important to us. We use the same 256-bit encryption and data security levels as all major banks. Our practices are monitored and verified by VeriSign and Digicert.
Independent
InsurEye is not owned by any bank, insurance company, insurance brokerage or any other financial services institution. We collect, validate, and analyze insurance experiences of real consumers.
Insightful
We aspire to equip you with insights, data and knowledge to help in making informed decisions around personal finance, insurance quotes, and other important matters. We are always open for your comments.
We had a premium insurance package with TD that was represented to us as full coverage. We had endorsement packages added to cover any gaps - it was sold to us as peace of mind, worry-free insurance. We had a water supply issue with our home, which was a leak on our side of the demarcation point with the city. It looked like we would have to have the entire water supply line replaced and inspected. This involved tearing up our concrete driveway and walkway. After the tear up and line repair, there would be a waiting period of several months before the driveway could be repaired. We got quotes on the work and contacted TD who said they would cover the tear-out, and the repairs to the driveway, but not the plumbing. The TD representative said we would have no trouble reopening the claim at a later date to have the driveway repairs covered. At the time of the tear-out, we convinced the contractor to just do the tear-out at the curb stop valve, because we thought the leak might be there and this would greatly reduce the scope of the work. The leak was there and the full waterline did not need to be replaced, so only a small portion of our driveway was impacted. This reduced both the tear-out cost and the future driveway repair costs. The cost for both portions of the work was now about half of the original estimate. The driveway repair was scheduled at the end of the season, but the final scheduling was done quickly to accommodate the contractors' year-end commitments. We contacted TD insurance, but the preparation work was being done as we were reopening the claim. In view of this, we compromised on the repair to control the costs for the insurance company. To minimize costs, we repaired a smaller portion of the driveway than we would have done if paying ourselves, although this would result in a colour matching issue. We tried to reopen our claim but the representative who had done the initial work had left the company. We exchanged emails with the new representative, but he didn't understand the history of the claim or the technical aspects of the nature of the work. They didn't seem to have notes in our file about what had been agreed to and placed the onus on us to provide supporting emails. We provided what we had, but much of the agreement with the original representative was over the phone. The new representative said our claim was now denied, even though the final cost was about half of the original estimate. His emails had false assumptions that supported not paying the claim. When we responded to correct these errors, he would send back another email with more excuses about why they would not honour their original agreement. He denied that the prior representative had assured coverage of the work, despite the fact he had done this on multiple occasions. We tried to contact the new representative by phone to engage in a richer dialogue than had been afforded through emails, but he wouldn't take our calls. His voicemail message indicated he would return our call that business day, but this did not happen. We finally gave up and paid for the repairs ourselves to avoid further stress and loss of sleep. We believe they broke the law by making an assurance to us that affected our course of action and position, potentially impacting our property value, only to later deny the claim. They also misrepresented their policy, since we obviously didn't have worry-free coverage. They do have recourse for denied claims, but this multi-tiered process seems principally designed to frustrate the customer to the point of capitulation. We would not be upset with TD Insurance if they had been honest with us from the outset of our claim so that we could have had the work done the way we wanted. They basically lied to us on multiple occasions and provided markedly inferior customer service. We will be engaging another provider for all of our future insurance needs. We were customers for 20 years but didn't have a lot of experience with how TD handles claims. After witnessing this aspect of their service, we strongly recommend not choosing TD Insurance as your provider.